Skip to content

Always on: keeps you signed in and saves choices. Accept all helps us see which pages you use and fix errors.

Settings
$1 first week
CURRENT
▲-2.5 → -3 (-0.5) since open NE @ CHI CHI -2.5 → -3 · BetRivers — open NE @ CHI matchup
Access: Anonymous access. Content follows.

Blog and learning

Find a published guide, inspect its sources, and put the idea into practice.

Back to articles

Clear filters
All NFLNBAMLBNHLWNBAUFC
NewestStart here All topics SpreadTotalsPropsDFSFantasyBankrollModels

Articles

Answers, short and sourced

  • Are sports betting models worth paying for?

    Sports betting models are worth paying for only if they show credible proof of beating no-vig closing prices. Pay for transparent edge, not confident picks, glossy records, or a feed that hides its math.

    Updated

  • Are free betting calculators accurate?

    Free betting calculators are accurate when they use the correct formulas. No-vig, Kelly, and parlay EV math is deterministic, so the real edge comes from your probability inputs, not a paid calculator wrapper.

    Updated

  • How accurate are model-based NFL picks?

    Model-based NFL picks are accurate when they beat break-even over time, but calibration and CLV matter more than a single win rate; about 52.4% ATS breaks even at -110.

    Updated

All answers

Pundit ledger

  • The Bill Simmons Podcast NBA

    Hit rate 62.3% on 56 graded calls, 95% range 60 to 83%.

  • Thinking Basketball NBA

    Hit rate 58.4% on 27 graded calls, 95% range 55 to 87%.

    Small sample: fewer than 30 graded picks so far.

  • Portland Trail Blazers (Official) NBA

    Hit rate 55.7% on 20 graded calls, 95% range 48 to 85%.

    Small sample: fewer than 30 graded picks so far.

  • CBS Sports NFL NFL

    Hit rate 40.0% on 25 graded calls, 95% range 15 to 65%.

    Small sample: fewer than 30 graded picks so far.

Graded through Jun 10, 2026.

Full pundit board

Podcasts

All episodes

The live Desk is loading. Published articles are available above.